Contexte d'engagement, de mobilisation sociale et défis communautaires Openredu.org
DOI :
https://doi.org/10.31416/rsdv.v12i2.645Mots-clés :
engagement, mobilisation sociale, communauté du logiciel libre, openreduRésumé
Dans le scénario technologique contemporain, les communautés du logiciel libre ont joué un rôle crucial en mettant en avant les plateformes qui cherchent à offrir des solutions éducatives open source aux établissements d’enseignement et d’apprentissage. Cependant, le succès et la durabilité des communautés dépendent en grande partie de l’engagement des membres, ainsi que des stratégies adoptées pour promouvoir la collaboration et la participation continue. Compte tenu de cela, l'objectif de cette étude est de décrire l'expérience vécue dans le contexte de la communauté Openredu.org comme environnement de recherche, d'innovation et de collaboration dans le développement de projets éducatifs. Pour cela, il fallait participer activement aux stratégies utilisées pour impliquer les membres bénévoles de la communauté. De plus, développer des approches technologiques, enquêter sur les activités, cartographier les stratégies, les caractéristiques de gouvernance et les expériences qui rapprochent les membres de la mission, de la vision et des valeurs du projet. Les résultats mettent en évidence l'expérience d'engagement des membres, motivée par la collaboration, l'apprentissage et la reconnaissance du rôle du leadership dans l'organisation et la facilitation du processus décisionnel. Il est conclu que des défis financiers et humains doivent être constamment relevés pour améliorer le projet.
Références
ATSDR, Agency for Toxic Substances & Disease Registry. Principles of Community Engagement. Ed. 2. 2011. Disponível em: https://www.atsdr.cdc.gov/communityengagement/pce_pubdevelopment.html. Acesso em: 01 de mar. de 2023.
BACON, J. The art of community: Building the new age of participation. " O'Reilly Media, Inc.". 2012.
BARRETT, D.; FLETCHER, B.; HUFF, D. Cultural Changes Key to Reducing Barriers to Open Source Software. AFCEA.org. 2007. Disponível em: http://bit.ly/2GvixPZ. Acesso em: 15 abr. 2023.
BRAGA, P. H. C.; CRUZ, S. B. O.; DIAS, L. R. Desafios na migração do software proprietário para o software livre em um projeto de extensão. In: LIANZA, Sidney (Org.); ADDOR, Felipe (Org.). (Org.). Extensão e Políticas Públicas: o agir integrado para o desenvolvimento social - Pesquisa, Ação e Tecnologia - vol. 2. 1 ed. Rio de Janeiro: Editora UFRJ, v. 2, 2015. p. 95-108.
BRAUGHT, G. et al. Engagement Models in Education-Oriented H/FOSS Projects. In: Proceedings of the 54th ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education v. 1, 2023. p. 409-415. https://doi.org/10.1145/3545945.3569835
CARILLO, K.; HUFF, S.; CHAWNER, B. What makes a good contributor? Understanding contributor behavior within large Free/Open Source Software projects–A socialization perspective. The Journal of Strategic Information Systems, v. 26, n. 4, 2017. p. 322-359. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsis.2017.03.001
ERENKRANTZ, J.; Taylor, R. Supporting Distributed and Decentralized Projects: Drawing Lessons from the Open Source Community. 2003.
ETZKOWITZ, H.; ZHOU, C. Hélice Tríplice: inovação e empreendedorismo universidade-indústria-governo. Estudos Avançados, v. 31, n. 90, 2017. p. 23-48.
KAUR, R.; CHAHAL, K. K.; SAINI, M. Understanding community participation and engagement in open source software Projects: A systematic mapping study. Journal of king saud university-computer and information sciences, v. 34, n. 7, 2022. p. 4607-4625. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jksuci.2020.10.020
KAUR, R.; KAUR, K. Insights into developers’ abandonment in FLOSS projects. In: Intelligent Sustainable Systems: Selected Papers of WorldS4 2021, Springer Singapore, v. 1, 2022. p. 731-740. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-6309-3_69
LAURENT, A. M. St. Understanding open source and free software licensing: guide to navigating licensing issues in existing & new software. O'Reilly Media, Inc. 2004.
LANGLOIS, R.; GARZARELLI, G. Of Hackers and Hairdressers: Modularity and the Organizational Economics of Open-source Collaboration, Working papers. University of Connecticut, Department of Economics. 2008. https://doi.org/10.1080/13662710801954559
LÉVY, P. Cibercultura. 2. 44d. São Paulo: Ed. 34. 1999.
LINDMAN, J.; HAMMOUDA, I. Investigating Relationships Between FLOSS Foundations and FLOSS Projects. In: Open Source Systems: Towards Robust Practices: 13th IFIP WG 2.13 International Conference, OSS 2017, Buenos Aires, Argentina, May 22-23, 2017, Proceedings 13. Springer International Publishing, 2017. p. 14-22. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-57735-7_2
LUNDELL, B. et al. Addressing lock-in, interoperability, and long-term maintenance challenges through open source: How can companies strategically use open source?. In: Open Source Systems: Towards Robust Practices: 13th IFIP WG 2.13 International Conference, OSS 2017, Buenos Aires, Argentina, May 22-23, 2017, Proceedings 13. Springer International Publishing, 2017. p. 80-88. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-57735-7_9
MIKKONEN, T. VADÉN, T.; VAINIO, N. The Protestant ethic strikes back: Open source developers and the ethic of capitalism. First Monday, 12(2). 2007. https://doi.org/10.5210/fm.v12i2.1623
MISTRÍK, I. et al. Collaborative software engineering: challenges and prospects. Springer Berlin Heidelberg. 2010. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-10294-3_19
Pink, S. et al. Etnografía digital. Ediciones Morata. 2019.
PREATER, A. Free and Open Source software and cultural change, at Library Camp. 2012. Disponível em: http://bit.ly/2Du0rgN
RIBEIRO, D. Motivação no Contexto Open Source: Um estudo de caso na comunidade Android Brasil-Projetos. Editora Corisco, Recife. 2018.
RAYMOND, E. S. The Cathedral & The Bazaar - Musings on Linux and Open Source by an Accidental Revolutionary Sebastopol, Ca, O·Reilly. 2001.
SCHILLING, A. What do we know about FLOSS developers' attraction, retention, and commitment? A literature review. In: 2014 47th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences. IEEE, 2014. p. 4003-4012. https://doi.org/10.1109/HICSS.2014.495
SILVA, D. G.; Coutinho, C.; Costa, C. J. Factors influencing free and open-source software adoption in developing countries—an empirical study. Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity, v. 9, n. 1, 2023. p. 21-33. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joitmc.2023.01.002
STEINMACHER, I. et al. A systematic literature review on the barriers faced by newcomers to open source software projects. Information and Software Technology, v. 59, 2015. p. 67-85. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.infsof.2014.11.001
STOL, K. J.; ALI BABAR, M. Challenges in using open source software in product development: a review of the literature. In: Proceedings of the 3rd international workshop on emerging trends in free/libre/open source software research and development. 2010. p. 17-22. https://doi.org/10.1145/1833272.1833276
WASSERMAN, A. I. et al. OSSpal: finding and evaluating open source software. In: Open Source Systems: Towards Robust Practices: 13th IFIP WG 2.13 International Conference, OSS 2017, Buenos Aires, Argentina, May 22-23, 2017, Proceedings 13. Springer International Publishing, 2017. p. 193-203. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-57735-7_18
WEST, J.; GALLAGHER, S. Challenges of open innovation: the paradox of firm investment in open?source software. R&d Management, v. 36, n. 3, 2006. p. 319-331. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9310.2006.00436.x
Téléchargements
Publiée
Comment citer
Numéro
Rubrique
Licence
(c) Tous droits réservés Revista Semiárido De Visu 2024
Ce travail est disponible sous la licence Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International .