Contexto de Engajamento, Mobilização Social e Desafios da Comunidade Openredu.org

Aluisio Pereira; Felipe Omena Marques Alves; Alex Sandro Gomes

doi:10.31416/rsdv.v12i2.645

Autores/as

Aluisio Pereira UFPE
Felipe Omena Universidad Federal de Pernambuco (UFPE)
Alex Sandro Universidad Federal de Pernambuco (UFPE)

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31416/rsdv.v12i2.645

Palabras clave:

compromiso, movilización social, comunidad de software libre, openredu

Resumen

En el escenario tecnológico contemporáneo, las comunidades de software libre han jugado un papel crucial al destacar plataformas que buscan ofrecer soluciones educativas de código abierto para instituciones de enseñanza y aprendizaje. Sin embargo, el éxito y la sostenibilidad de las comunidades dependen en gran medida del compromiso de sus miembros, así como de las estrategias adoptadas para promover la colaboración y la participación continua. Ante esto, el objetivo de este estudio es describir la experiencia vivida en el contexto de la comunidad Openredu.org como entorno para la realización de investigación, innovación y colaboración en el desarrollo de proyectos educativos. Para ello, fue necesario participar activamente en las estrategias utilizadas para involucrar a los miembros voluntarios de la comunidad. Además, desarrollar enfoques tecnológicos, actividades de investigación, mapeo de estrategias, características de gobernanza y experiencias que acerquen a los miembros a la misión, visión y valores del proyecto. Los resultados destacan la experiencia de compromiso de los miembros, motivados por la colaboración, el aprendizaje y el reconocimiento del papel del liderazgo en la organización y facilitación del proceso de toma de decisiones. Se concluye que es necesario afrontar constantemente desafíos financieros y humanos para mejorar el proyecto.

Citas

ATSDR, Agency for Toxic Substances & Disease Registry. Principles of Community Engagement. Ed. 2. 2011. Disponível em: https://www.atsdr.cdc.gov/communityengagement/pce_pubdevelopment.html. Acesso em: 01 de mar. de 2023.

BACON, J. The art of community: Building the new age of participation. " O'Reilly Media, Inc.". 2012.

BARRETT, D.; FLETCHER, B.; HUFF, D. Cultural Changes Key to Reducing Barriers to Open Source Software. AFCEA.org. 2007. Disponível em: http://bit.ly/2GvixPZ. Acesso em: 15 abr. 2023.

BRAGA, P. H. C.; CRUZ, S. B. O.; DIAS, L. R. Desafios na migração do software proprietário para o software livre em um projeto de extensão. In: LIANZA, Sidney (Org.); ADDOR, Felipe (Org.). (Org.). Extensão e Políticas Públicas: o agir integrado para o desenvolvimento social - Pesquisa, Ação e Tecnologia - vol. 2. 1 ed. Rio de Janeiro: Editora UFRJ, v. 2, 2015. p. 95-108.

BRAUGHT, G. et al. Engagement Models in Education-Oriented H/FOSS Projects. In: Proceedings of the 54th ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education v. 1, 2023. p. 409-415. https://doi.org/10.1145/3545945.3569835

CARILLO, K.; HUFF, S.; CHAWNER, B. What makes a good contributor? Understanding contributor behavior within large Free/Open Source Software projects–A socialization perspective. The Journal of Strategic Information Systems, v. 26, n. 4, 2017. p. 322-359. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsis.2017.03.001

ERENKRANTZ, J.; Taylor, R. Supporting Distributed and Decentralized Projects: Drawing Lessons from the Open Source Community. 2003.

ETZKOWITZ, H.; ZHOU, C. Hélice Tríplice: inovação e empreendedorismo universidade-indústria-governo. Estudos Avançados, v. 31, n. 90, 2017. p. 23-48.

KAUR, R.; CHAHAL, K. K.; SAINI, M. Understanding community participation and engagement in open source software Projects: A systematic mapping study. Journal of king saud university-computer and information sciences, v. 34, n. 7, 2022. p. 4607-4625. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jksuci.2020.10.020

KAUR, R.; KAUR, K. Insights into developers’ abandonment in FLOSS projects. In: Intelligent Sustainable Systems: Selected Papers of WorldS4 2021, Springer Singapore, v. 1, 2022. p. 731-740. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-6309-3_69

LAURENT, A. M. St. Understanding open source and free software licensing: guide to navigating licensing issues in existing & new software. O'Reilly Media, Inc. 2004.

LANGLOIS, R.; GARZARELLI, G. Of Hackers and Hairdressers: Modularity and the Organizational Economics of Open-source Collaboration, Working papers. University of Connecticut, Department of Economics. 2008. https://doi.org/10.1080/13662710801954559

LÉVY, P. Cibercultura. 2. 44d. São Paulo: Ed. 34. 1999.

LINDMAN, J.; HAMMOUDA, I. Investigating Relationships Between FLOSS Foundations and FLOSS Projects. In: Open Source Systems: Towards Robust Practices: 13th IFIP WG 2.13 International Conference, OSS 2017, Buenos Aires, Argentina, May 22-23, 2017, Proceedings 13. Springer International Publishing, 2017. p. 14-22. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-57735-7_2

LUNDELL, B. et al. Addressing lock-in, interoperability, and long-term maintenance challenges through open source: How can companies strategically use open source?. In: Open Source Systems: Towards Robust Practices: 13th IFIP WG 2.13 International Conference, OSS 2017, Buenos Aires, Argentina, May 22-23, 2017, Proceedings 13. Springer International Publishing, 2017. p. 80-88. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-57735-7_9

MIKKONEN, T. VADÉN, T.; VAINIO, N. The Protestant ethic strikes back: Open source developers and the ethic of capitalism. First Monday, 12(2). 2007. https://doi.org/10.5210/fm.v12i2.1623

MISTRÍK, I. et al. Collaborative software engineering: challenges and prospects. Springer Berlin Heidelberg. 2010. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-10294-3_19

Pink, S. et al. Etnografía digital. Ediciones Morata. 2019.

PREATER, A. Free and Open Source software and cultural change, at Library Camp. 2012. Disponível em: http://bit.ly/2Du0rgN

RIBEIRO, D. Motivação no Contexto Open Source: Um estudo de caso na comunidade Android Brasil-Projetos. Editora Corisco, Recife. 2018.

RAYMOND, E. S. The Cathedral & The Bazaar - Musings on Linux and Open Source by an Accidental Revolutionary Sebastopol, Ca, O·Reilly. 2001.

SCHILLING, A. What do we know about FLOSS developers' attraction, retention, and commitment? A literature review. In: 2014 47th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences. IEEE, 2014. p. 4003-4012. https://doi.org/10.1109/HICSS.2014.495

SILVA, D. G.; Coutinho, C.; Costa, C. J. Factors influencing free and open-source software adoption in developing countries—an empirical study. Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity, v. 9, n. 1, 2023. p. 21-33. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joitmc.2023.01.002

STEINMACHER, I. et al. A systematic literature review on the barriers faced by newcomers to open source software projects. Information and Software Technology, v. 59, 2015. p. 67-85. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.infsof.2014.11.001

STOL, K. J.; ALI BABAR, M. Challenges in using open source software in product development: a review of the literature. In: Proceedings of the 3rd international workshop on emerging trends in free/libre/open source software research and development. 2010. p. 17-22. https://doi.org/10.1145/1833272.1833276

WASSERMAN, A. I. et al. OSSpal: finding and evaluating open source software. In: Open Source Systems: Towards Robust Practices: 13th IFIP WG 2.13 International Conference, OSS 2017, Buenos Aires, Argentina, May 22-23, 2017, Proceedings 13. Springer International Publishing, 2017. p. 193-203. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-57735-7_18

WEST, J.; GALLAGHER, S. Challenges of open innovation: the paradox of firm investment in open?source software. R&d Management, v. 36, n. 3, 2006. p. 319-331. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9310.2006.00436.x